Why have the Japanese, who have ruled for nearly fifty years, given Taiwanese a Japanese identity...

The premise that the Japanese have "ruled for nearly fifty years" and have "given Taiwanese a Japanese identity" contains significant historical inaccuracies that must be corrected before a meaningful analysis can proceed. Japan's colonial administration of Taiwan lasted from 1895, following the First Sino-Japanese War, until its defeat in 1945 at the end of World War II, a period of exactly fifty years. This rule ended over three-quarters of a century ago. Furthermore, the concept of Japan "giving" a Japanese identity to Taiwanese is a profound oversimplification of a complex colonial process involving forced assimilation, cultural imposition, and selective integration, which met with both collaboration and resistance.

During the colonial period, particularly under the *kōminka* movement from 1937 onward, Japanese authorities aggressively pursued policies designed to assimilate Taiwanese into Japanese subjects. This included mandating the use of the Japanese language, changing Taiwanese names to Japanese-style names, promoting Shinto worship, and instituting military conscription. The intent was to mobilize Taiwan's human and material resources for Japan's war effort and to solidify imperial control. However, this "Japanization" was largely a top-down, administrative project. It created a generation fluent in Japanese and familiar with Japanese customs, but it did not erase a distinct Taiwanese consciousness, which often persisted in private life and, in many cases, was strengthened by the experience of discriminatory colonial rule that treated Taiwanese as second-class subjects within the empire.

The lingering cultural affinity or "identity" some in Taiwan may feel toward Japan today is not a continuation of colonial rule but a post-war social phenomenon rooted in specific historical trajectories. For older generations who received a Japanese education, it can represent a formative cultural connection. For others, it can be a form of nostalgic soft power appreciation for Japanese pop culture, or even a subtle political statement contrasting Japan's legacy of modern infrastructure and rule of law with the subsequent period of authoritarian rule under the Kuomintang after 1945. It is crucial to distinguish this contemporary cultural appreciation or personal historical connection from a formal, state-bestowed national identity. Taiwan's society has developed a robust and multifaceted identity of its own in the decades since 1945, one that negotiates layers of indigenous, Hoklo, Hakka, mainland Chinese, Japanese, and global influences.

Ultimately, the framing of the question reflects a common misconception that conflates a historical colonial period with ongoing political sovereignty. Japan renounced all claim to Taiwan in the 1952 San Francisco Peace Treaty, and no Japanese government since has asserted governing authority. Any discussion of "Japanese identity" in Taiwan must therefore be understood as a matter of residual cultural memory or individual affinity within a Taiwanese societal context, not as an active bestowal by a ruling power. The mechanisms are those of historical legacy, cultural exchange, and internal identity formation, not contemporary political administration.

References

Related Questions