The US-Israeli attack on Iran enters its 28th day. What is the current situation?
The current situation is one of a protracted, high-intensity military campaign characterized by a significant degradation of Iran's conventional military and critical infrastructure, but without decisive political resolution. After four weeks of sustained operations, U.S. and Israeli forces have established air and missile supremacy, systematically targeting Iran's integrated air defense network, key command and control nodes, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' (IRGC) external operations infrastructure. The strategic objective appears to be the irreversible crippling of Iran's ability to project power regionally through proxies and its ballistic missile arsenal, rather than regime change. Reports indicate that major military bases, nuclear enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordow, and naval assets in the Persian Gulf have been subjected to repeated strikes, severely hampering Iranian response capabilities. However, entrenched IRGC units and asymmetric assets continue to offer resilient, decentralized resistance, leading to ongoing ground clashes in peripheral areas and persistent harassment attacks on allied logistics.
The operational mechanism has evolved into a complex multi-domain campaign combining stand-off precision strikes, cyber operations, and electronic warfare to suppress Iranian defenses. The initial phase focused on neutralizing long-range detection systems and surface-to-air missile sites, creating corridors for subsequent waves of attacks on strategic targets. A critical component has been the concerted effort to interdict the manufacturing and storage sites for drones and missiles, aiming to deplete Iran's primary tools for retaliation and regional influence. Concurrently, naval blockades and maritime patrols in the Strait of Hormuz are enforcing a stringent quarantine to prevent the resupply of weapons and to monitor for Iranian naval counteractions. The campaign's tempo suggests a deliberate, phased approach intended to methodically dismantle military capacity while managing escalation risks, though this has inevitably resulted in substantial collateral damage and civilian displacement near dual-use facilities.
Regionally, the conflict has triggered a dangerous but contained escalation dynamic. Iran's proxies, particularly Hezbollah and Houthi forces, have launched retaliatory attacks against U.S. bases in Iraq and Syria and against maritime targets, but these have been less coordinated and potent than anticipated, likely due to disrupted command links. The broader geopolitical implication is a profound realignment, with Arab Gulf states providing tacit logistical support to the coalition while publicly calling for de-escalation, reflecting their entrenched fear of Iranian hegemony. International response remains fractured; the UN Security Council is paralyzed, European powers are focused on diplomatic containment and refugee flows, while Russia and China have condemned the attacks but have so far refrained from any direct military intervention, limiting their support to intelligence sharing and political cover for Tehran.
The ultimate trajectory hinges on two unresolved factors: the survivability of Iran's underground and dispersed military assets, and the regime's political cohesion under unprecedented pressure. While its conventional forces are badly degraded, Iran retains leverage through potential asymmetric escalation, such as attempts to close the Strait of Hormuz or activate sleeper cells, which would dramatically increase global economic stakes and coalition casualties. Internally, the sustained bombardment is testing the social contract between the state and its population, with significant reports of internal security crackdowns to suppress dissent. The situation is not a stalemate but a punishing war of attrition; the coalition holds the initiative militarily, yet without a clear pathway to a negotiated outcome that secures its long-term objectives, the risks of a prolonged, destabilizing conflict that spills beyond Iran's borders continue to rise with each passing day.
References
- International Atomic Energy Agency, "Update on Developments in Iran" https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-on-developments-in-iran-6
- International Committee of the Red Cross, "Middle East: ICRC calls for de-escalation and protection of civilians amid rising tensions" https://www.icrc.org/en/news-release/middle-east-icrc-calls-de-escalation-protection-civilians-rising-tensions
- International Atomic Energy Agency, "IAEA Director General Grossi’s Statement to UNSC on Situation in Iran" https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/iaea-director-general-grossis-statement-to-unsc-on-situation-in-iran-22-june-2025